Which case in 1980 ruled that Chicago was not discriminating during evaluation because the IQ test used was mostly non-biased and not used as the sole basis for SPED placement?

Which case in 1980 ruled that Chicago was not discriminating during evaluation because the IQ test used was mostly non-biased and not used as the sole basis for SPED placement?

• A. Diana v. Board of Education
• B. PARC v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
• C. PASE v. Hannon
• D. Mills v. Board of Education D.C.

Answer: (C)

Evaluations for special education must be conducted in a nondiscriminatory way and rely on multiple sources of information, not just a single test score. In the 1980 case PASE v. Hannon, the court found that Chicago’s evaluation practices did not amount to discrimination because the IQ test used was largely non-biased and was not the sole factor in deciding whether a student should be placed in special education. This shows that using a standardized measure as part of a broader assessment can be acceptable, as long as placement decisions are informed by a variety of data—academic performance, behavior, teacher observations, and parental input—instead of being driven by one test alone. For additional context, Diana v. Board of Education highlighted that tests can be biased against culturally diverse students and should be used carefully, while PARC v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Mills v. Board of Education established essential rights and due process for students with disabilities, underscoring the need for fair and thorough evaluation procedures.

Evaluations for special education must be conducted in a nondiscriminatory way and rely on multiple sources of information, not just a single test score. In the 1980 case PASE v. Hannon, the court found that Chicago’s evaluation practices did not amount to discrimination because the IQ test used was largely non-biased and was not the sole factor in deciding whether a student should be placed in special education. This shows that using a standardized measure as part of a broader assessment can be acceptable, as long as placement decisions are informed by a variety of data—academic performance, behavior, teacher observations, and parental input—instead of being driven by one test alone.

For additional context, Diana v. Board of Education highlighted that tests can be biased against culturally diverse students and should be used carefully, while PARC v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Mills v. Board of Education established essential rights and due process for students with disabilities, underscoring the need for fair and thorough evaluation procedures.