Which case ruled that Chicago was not discriminating during evaluation and that IQ tests were not the sole basis for SPED placement?

Which case ruled that Chicago was not discriminating during evaluation and that IQ tests were not the sole basis for SPED placement?

• A. Diana v. Board of Education
• B. PASE v. Hannon
• C. PARC v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
• D. Larry P. V. Riles

Answer: (B)

The main idea is that deciding whether a student should receive special education must be based on a comprehensive, fair evaluation, not on a single test score. In PASE v. Hannon, the court reviewed Chicago’s evaluation practices and found no discriminatory impact in how students were assessed for special education. Importantly, the ruling also reinforces that IQ tests cannot be the sole basis for placement; eligibility decisions must rely on multiple sources of information—cognitive, academic, and functional data gathered from various assessments and observations, with attention to language and cultural context. This ensures that placement decisions are accurate and not biased by a single measure. For context, the other cases cover related but distinct issues: PARC v. Pennsylvania established the right to a free appropriate public education and due process for students with disabilities; Diana v. Board of Education highlighted the need to consider language and cultural factors to avoid misplacing students in special education; Larry P. v. Riles focused on prohibiting the use of IQ tests as the sole basis for placement, especially when tests are biased against certain groups.

The main idea is that deciding whether a student should receive special education must be based on a comprehensive, fair evaluation, not on a single test score. In PASE v. Hannon, the court reviewed Chicago’s evaluation practices and found no discriminatory impact in how students were assessed for special education. Importantly, the ruling also reinforces that IQ tests cannot be the sole basis for placement; eligibility decisions must rely on multiple sources of information—cognitive, academic, and functional data gathered from various assessments and observations, with attention to language and cultural context. This ensures that placement decisions are accurate and not biased by a single measure.

For context, the other cases cover related but distinct issues: PARC v. Pennsylvania established the right to a free appropriate public education and due process for students with disabilities; Diana v. Board of Education highlighted the need to consider language and cultural factors to avoid misplacing students in special education; Larry P. v. Riles focused on prohibiting the use of IQ tests as the sole basis for placement, especially when tests are biased against certain groups.